Friday, July 6, 2007

I wish Ranil was president..



Would stuff've been any better?

6 comments:

Sam said...

No. I don’t think so. Things may be deferent. But not better. Even if it is Ranil or Mahninda, we Sri Lankans are always Sri Lankans.

Times Eye said...

Don't be silly,Both guys are Real Horu

Anonymous said...

the difference is we'd have had peace and a lot better and stronger economy.

Anonymous said...

137mRs wouldn't have been spent on war?

Anonymous said...

judging by his idea of thoppigala ("a useless mountainous terrain covered in jungle with no strategic importance"), i think if ranil was let on we'd be on stalled peace talks by now, with LTTE imoprting arms by the pile and forces confined to barracks, and, oh yes, tiger pistolmen roaming colombo killing intelligence and special unit officers, who "did nothing" according to the UNP.

Anonymous said...

This can be said only either by a blind or an idiot supporting LTTE. Ranil proved himself to be a treator of Sri Lanka. He was to give LTTE's demands and now act in a way soildiers are demoralized. He doesn't have any good feelings for Sri Lankan victory instead he is supporting LTTE and considered about his selfish needs. Mahinda may be a hora, but he has balls to do what was necessary to be done to solve the biggest problem Sri lnaka has. Sri Lanka lost many of its sons becasue of LTTE's false negotiations. Ranil betrayed Sri Lankans by opening doors to LTTE terrorists to extend their ativities throughout the island. There is a saying 'Sinhalaya Modaya';that is why still national treators like Ranil lead Sri Lanka and LTTE kill Sri Lankans...